2021 AFGROW Workshop Round Robin: Difference between revisions
From Engineered Residual Stress Implementation (ERSI)
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "ASIP Conference Presentation_ERSI SIF Round Robin.pdf ERSI-2021-01 Stress Intensity Comparison Round Robin & Data.pdf ERSI-2021-01 Stress Intensity Comparison Round Robin.pdf ICAF2023_ERSI_Final.pdf SIF Round Robin Data Summary.xlsx Cross-Comparisons of Stress Intensity Factors from Various Sources - The Pathway to Improved SIF Solutions.pdf SIF Comparison matrix - ERSI Round Robin.pdf") |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 50%;" | |||
|- | |||
|'''Point of Contact(s):''' ''Kevin Walker'' | |||
|- | |||
|'''Objective:''' ''The challenge was to predict the fatigue crack growth under a given scenario involving a pin-loaded compact tension C(T) specimen subjected to constant amplitude loading at R=0.1, with overloads applied at two pre-determined points in the crack propagation.'' | |||
|- | |||
| | |||
*[https://residualstress.org/images/7/71/Walker_CT_Overload_challenge.docx Spike Overload Challenge] | |||
*[https://residualstress.org/images/9/92/Walker_etal_AFGROW_2021.pdf Spike Overload Crack Growth Challenge (AFGROW Workshop 2021)] | |||
|} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 7 November 2023
| Point of Contact(s): Kevin Walker |
| Objective: The challenge was to predict the fatigue crack growth under a given scenario involving a pin-loaded compact tension C(T) specimen subjected to constant amplitude loading at R=0.1, with overloads applied at two pre-determined points in the crack propagation. |
