2021 AFGROW Workshop Round Robin: Difference between revisions
From Engineered Residual Stress Implementation (ERSI)
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 50%;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 50%;" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |'''Point of Contact(s):''' ''Kevin Walker'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
|''''' | |'''Objective:''' ''The challenge was to predict the fatigue crack growth under a given scenario involving a pin-loaded compact tension C(T) specimen subjected to constant amplitude loading at R=0.1, with overloads applied at two pre-determined points in the crack propagation.'' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
* | *[https://residualstress.org/images/7/71/Walker_CT_Overload_challenge.docx Spike Overload Challenge] | ||
*[https://residualstress.org/images/9/92/Walker_etal_AFGROW_2021.pdf Spike Overload Crack Growth Challenge (AFGROW Workshop 2021)] | |||
* | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:42, 7 November 2023
| Point of Contact(s): Kevin Walker |
| Objective: The challenge was to predict the fatigue crack growth under a given scenario involving a pin-loaded compact tension C(T) specimen subjected to constant amplitude loading at R=0.1, with overloads applied at two pre-determined points in the crack propagation. |
