2023 Boeing IRAD Testing: Difference between revisions

From Engineered Residual Stress Implementation (ERSI)
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:
|-
|-
|'''Data that is made available:'''
|'''Data that is made available:'''
*7075-T6 Spike Overload Test
*[https://residualstress.org/images/0/0e/7075T6_SpikeOverload_Boeing_IRAD_Test.xlsx 7075-T6 Spike Overload Test]
|}
|}


Line 16: Line 16:
|-
|-
|'''Data that is made available:'''
|'''Data that is made available:'''
*Ti-6Al-4V Hole Shakedown Test
*[https://residualstress.org/images/d/de/Ti64_Boeing_IRAD_Shakedown_Test.xlsx Ti-6Al-4V Hole Shakedown Test]
|}
|}


Line 26: Line 26:
|-
|-
|'''Data that is made available:'''
|'''Data that is made available:'''
*Ph13-8Mo Hole Shakedown Test
*[https://residualstress.org/images/d/de/Ph13-8Mo_Boeing_IRAD_Shakedown_Test.xlsx Ph13-8Mo Hole Shakedown Test]
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 15:00, 7 August 2024

Point of Contact: Moises Ocasio
Description: A spike overload test was conducted on 7075-T6 to improve the understanding of crack growth rate constraint-loss behavior as a function of thickness and finite width effects.
Data that is made available:
Point of Contact: Moises Ocasio
Description: A hole shakedown test was conducted on Ti-6l-4V LS to validate methods and best practices used to handle local yielding at holes due to extreme loads.
Data that is made available:
Point of Contact: Moises Ocasio
Description: A hole shakedown test was conducted on Ph13-8Mo LS to validate methods and best practices used to handle local yielding at holes due to extreme loads.
Data that is made available: