2022 Cx Variability Round Robin: Difference between revisions
From Engineered Residual Stress Implementation (ERSI)
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| | | | ||
*[https://residualstress.org/images/f/f6/ERSI_-_Analysis_Methods_Subcommittee_-_DTA_for_Variability_in_CX_RS_Round_Robin_-_FINAL.docx ERSI - Analysis Methods Subcommittee - DTA for Variability in CX RS Round Robin.docx] | *[https://residualstress.org/images/f/f6/ERSI_-_Analysis_Methods_Subcommittee_-_DTA_for_Variability_in_CX_RS_Round_Robin_-_FINAL.docx ERSI - Analysis Methods Subcommittee - DTA for Variability in CX RS Round Robin.docx] | ||
*[https://residualstress.org/images/d/df/Loghin_2025_validation_and_sensitivity_study_of_3D_FEA_based_solutions_against_two_sets_of_marker_bands_recorded_in_FCG_measurement.pdf AIAA 2025 presentation by Adrian Loghin] | |||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 14:35, 24 February 2025
| Point of Contact(s): TJ Spradlin |
| Objective: Recent discussion within the ERSI Analysis Methods & Testing Committee have identified a need to perform a round-robin exercise focusing on how uncertainty in fatigue response due to the random variability in residual stresses at Cold Expanded (CX) fastener holes can be captured in damage tolerance analysis (DTA). This round-robin seeks to address the following:
· Identify the sensitivity of DTA capabilities to variability in a CX fastener hole treated within specification · Identify the impact of using computational, empirical, or combined residual stress results in DTA · Anonymously compile ERSI community results for the above listed objectives for group comparison-to-test · Derive best-practices guidance from comparisons and in-depth-technical review by the ERSI community |
