My wiki:About: Difference between revisions
From Engineered Residual Stress Implementation (ERSI)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Adam-Morgan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Adam-Morgan (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Purpose: | Purpose: <br> | ||
1. Identify and lay out a roadmap for the implementation of engineered deep residual stress which can be used in the calculation of initial and recurring inspection intervals for fatigue and fracture critical aerospace components. <br> | 1. Identify and lay out a roadmap for the implementation of engineered deep residual stress which can be used in the calculation of initial and recurring inspection intervals for fatigue and fracture critical aerospace components. <br> | ||
2. Highlight gaps in the state-of-the-art and define how those gaps will be filled. <br> | 2. Highlight gaps in the state-of-the-art and define how those gaps will be filled. <br> | ||
3. Define the most effective way to document requirements and guidelines for fleet-wide implementation. | 3. Define the most effective way to document requirements and guidelines for fleet-wide implementation.<br><br> | ||
Working Group Structure: | Working Group Structure:<br> | ||
[[Committee:Residual Stress Process Simulation]] | [[Committee:Residual Stress Process Simulation]]<br> | ||
[[Committee:Verification and Validation Testing]] | [[Committee:Verification and Validation Testing]]<br> | ||
Revision as of 21:49, 5 December 2022
Purpose:
1. Identify and lay out a roadmap for the implementation of engineered deep residual stress which can be used in the calculation of initial and recurring inspection intervals for fatigue and fracture critical aerospace components.
2. Highlight gaps in the state-of-the-art and define how those gaps will be filled.
3. Define the most effective way to document requirements and guidelines for fleet-wide implementation.
Working Group Structure:
Committee:Residual Stress Process Simulation
Committee:Verification and Validation Testing
